Profiles

Jüri Ojaver

 

Jüri Ojaver (1955) entered the art scene in the beginning of the 1980’s, received several grand prizes from the Soros Contemporary Art Center in the 1990’s, participated in the Kwangju Biennial in South-Korea in 1995, represented Estonia at the Venice Biennial in 1999, is an active member of the art-organization Estonian Energies and has taught young sculptors, metal-artists and many others in the Estonian Academy of Arts. Jüri Ojaver is interested in memory and information storage – his relationship with the present and past in a general and personal context. Jüri Ojaver can be referred to, and rightly so, as an existentialist, although many of his art projects, mainly performances, can be described more as a peculiar gallows humor. Jüri Ojaver is a vivacious and growing artist, therefore his art is also a living and growing organism.Jüri Ojaver (1955) entered the art scene in the beginning of the 1980’s, received several grand prizes from the Soros Contemporary Art Center in the 1990’s, participated in the Kwangju Biennial in South-Korea in 1995, represented Estonia at the Venice Biennial in 1999, is an active member of the art-organization Estonian Energies and has taught young sculptors, metal-artists and many others in the Estonian Academy of Arts. Jüri Ojaver is interested in memory and information storage – his relationship with the present and past in a general and personal context. Jüri Ojaver can be referred to, and rightly so, as an existentialist, although many of his art projects, mainly performances, can be described more as a peculiar gallows humor. Jüri Ojaver is a vivacious and growing artist, therefore his art is also a living and growing organism.

 

artistsJüri Ojaver
placeEstonia
tags
castJüri Ojaver
cameraEva Jiřička
soundEva Jiřička
editingEva Jiřička
interviewEva Jiřička
categoryProfiles
published29. 12. 2012
languageČesky / English
embedlink icon
arrow down
related
Jüri Ojaver
Ideally architecture is not about fixing activities, fluxes or programs, or worse, about solving spatial problems. On the contrary, it is about opening up possibilities: the potential of a site, the hidden opportunity of a particular situation in time, of a programmatic conflict. It is about dealing with uncertainty, about enabling different and unforeseen scenarios. In that sense, architecture and urbanism are not opposed disciplines with different outcomes, but similar mediators, on different scales and in different degrees of complexity, with the same goal of enabling life.
How do bodies queer at the molecular level? How is this queering inextricably tied to industrial capitalism? And is there a way out of capitalist ruins, one that has been further exacerbated by the pandemic?